Showing posts with label audition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audition. Show all posts

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The Art of the Pick Up

No. This is not a post on dating advice. You can stop reading now if that's what you thought it was...

You guys have heard me rant a lot on my opinion of voice actors recording themselves. In short, I think it trains voice actors to be better editors than performers. Nowhere is this more evident than when I record a new talent for the very first time.

The established VA will have an innate ability to digest and analyze copy which will border on the intuitive. They've read words out loud to such a degree that they'll already have formed an idea of what their performance should consist almost before the rational thought sectors of the brain have kicked in. Watching a seasoned professional like Clancy Brown or Mark Elliot read through a piece of copy cold is a fascinating experience. They quite literally "feel" their way through the read, and largely before decision making skills have kicked in, their instinctive cold read is often better than most other "rehearsed" reads I will encounter.

Making Mistakes

Everyone makes mistakes. Fact. No way around it. Doesn't matter how good you are, most days you will flub a piece of a recording. What we're discussing here is the disparity in tactics for recovering from a mistake. In my opinion, this is related to two elements of experience, reading comprehension and relationship with the director/engineer. The former the performer has total control over, the latter needs to be developed over the course of a session.

Reading Comprehension

You have to read out loud every day.

I've harped on about this before, but it is still the primary tactic one has to developing the skills necessary to be competitive in this field. You need to train like a pro athlete. You need to be in shape. It's part mental, part muscular, but it HAS to be done. The benefits are cumulative, and until you're receiving session and audition copy every day, it's the only way one can bridge the gap between those entering the craft and those established.
The pure immersion in language will make an individual far more flexible at finding their place on the page, a skill as necessary to the VA as "finding your light" is to the stage actor. As one progresses beyond simply reading aloud, eventually the amount of information one can retain will begin to increase as well, which will aid in making decisions within a piece of copy, absorbing punctuation and formatting as a secondary method of informing delivery.
At later stages of experience, the eye's ability to scan, the brain's ability to interpret, and the mouth's ability to mechanically deliver will seem to work independently of each other. This level of proficiency is most readily witnessed in ADR and anime dubbing, where the performer is reacting to multiple stimuli simultaneously (makes it an even greater shame that dubbing doesn't pay better).
Before you think that you're already pretty good at reading, know that I've worked with dyslexic VA's, blind VA's, and even a couple VA's afflicted with demyelinating diseases that routinely crush otherwise "able-bodied" people. You've got to be good. VERY good.

Relationship

Here the VA has far less control over the experience, as largely they will not be able to set the rules for the session, but there are still habits and behaviors which can aid in copy delivery.
Flexibility will be key. Listening to and interpreting direction is insanely important to developing a rhythm early in the session or audition. The better the director and actor communicate, the better the session will go.
Questions are important (within reason), especially to inform booth etiquette. Every director has different rules for how they like copy delivered, how they like takes organized, how they like pick ups to be delivered. Asking:
"Would you like me to say 'pick up' or do you just want me to take the line over again?"
is a simple way to know what is expected of you when it comes to correcting a mistake. Of course this is where flexibility will be important. If you're used to noting your pick ups, and they ask you NOT to note pick ups, then that might distract you from your usual method of delivering copy.

At no point is it acceptable to make a mistake and just continue reading. I typically encounter this from the newest and greenest VA's entering the craft, but every now and then I'm surprised by someone who should know better. If you know you've made a mistake, picking it up or asking for help is preferred. Just continuing to plow through a piece of copy (in a take we can't use because of the mistake) is a really bad habit to cultivate, and will probably cause friction during sessions.

How do I handle pick ups?

I'm a CRAZY purist when it comes to pick ups. I will not acknowledge a mistake during a take. I find it rude, invasive, and interruptive to the process. Hitting the talkback is often a shock, so I only jump in when I know the take will not be serviceable or usable to avoid wasting time.
I do not want my actors to note pick ups. I don't want to hear them say "pick up" or "sorry" or anything else.
First it is distracting. For that instant, the VA is no longer their character, but themselves, and potentially frustrated. Immediately following the pick up acknowledgement, it typically takes a few words to get back into the flow of a piece of copy, which makes a clean edit slightly less likely.
Secondly, it's largely unnecessary. I often know a VA has made a mistake before they will. It's my job to listen and facilitate.
If the vibe can be maintained, simply taking the line over again is the best way (again, my opinion) to maintain both the emotional and technical consistency of the performance should a mistake be made.
A personal pet peeve is the performer who leaves the mic between every pick up, or every take. It means the proximity to the mic is constantly changing, which means it becomes increasingly difficult to make sure audio from different takes will match.

Tackling Frustration

This is the easiest topic to discuss, but the hardest to execute.
You can't get frustrated, not with a high powered acoustically sensitive piece of equipment RIGHT UP IN YOUR FACE and cranked to eleven.
You must treat the mic as a film actor would treat a lens that intimately close. We can practically hear every nuance of the performance on your face, every tick, frown, smile, blink, everything. This is often illustrated by what I call "the grind", where one small passage will stump or tongue twist a VA. In trying to pick the piece up you'll hear a series of re-takes, each getting louder, more urgent, and faster than the re-take before it as the VA tries to power their way through the challenge.
Voice actors are generally some of the most passionate performers I've ever had the pleasure of working with, and often some of that passion will manifest in their eagerness to please. I routinely encounter VA's who will mercilessly punish themselves over mistakes. It's not necessary. As both a casting and session director, if you're in my booth I want you to succeed. Simple as that. I'm on your side because you are solving a problem for me. You aren't letting me down. You aren't letting yourself down.

I fully expect mistakes to be made. I'm there to help if they are, but how the voice actor responds to making a mistake is far more important than whether or not a mistake is made.

Friday, May 13, 2011

A Fun Evening At The Voice Over Work Out Lounge!

I was honored when Roy Samuelson invited me to be a guest speaker/director for his Voice Over Workout Lounge. The VOWOL mission is to provide actors a safe place to play and workout, with guest speakers, in a fantastic recording/production facility.

I had a blast!

I’ve often found Thursday night workout groups to be a little problematic (quick tangent: why do so many actor workout groups take place on Thursdays?), it’s so late in the week that people are often already set to check out for the weekend, and I completely understand. After working during the day, it’s sometimes a bit much to ask someone to further challenge themselves at night.

I’m really glad that the VOWOL folks were game. It makes the evening flow so much more smoothly. They were curious, asking questions, taking notes, ready to play, and ready to be directed.

They kept me on my toes too. I fielded questions on mic/recording technique, casting expectations, script analysis, and performance method.

Big thanks to Tony, Craig, Iris, Susan, Stephanie, Wendy, Dean, and of course Roy for a fun night, and major shout out to Soundelux in Hollywood for the use of their fantastic facility and providing Justin the Engineer who was great to work with!

Can’t wait to do it again!
I got to hang out with the fine folks at the Voice Over Work Out Lounge, a REALLY fun evening working out some VO peeps!

Friday, January 14, 2011

A Rant on Bad Habits - Reading Comprehension

Microphone Macro - KM184
Ok.
I haven't gotten cranky on this blog for a little while, but I did a casting job today that got me all riled up, so you get cranky-pants Juan now.

I've noticed another bad habit developing in the world of voice over auditioning. See, what I do is kind of old school. The company I work with still does in-house auditions where the talent drive to us to be recorded and directed. The biggest advantage to this approach is we give our clients a really hands on and carefully considered and selected group of talent to cast their projects from. For talent, it reduces the amount of competition you might face. A web casting can generate hundreds (if not thousands) of submissions, we typically narrow our field down to about 30 depending on what the client asks for. It's a win-win for clients and talent.

We work really hard at trying to keep open lines of communication with agents and managers. It's vital to our business that we know the local scene, and are very familiar with what talent can do. When new talent are breaking in, we need to know about them.

Now actors, this is where I'm getting a little concerned. Over the last several years, I've noticed a decline in reading comprehension and the ability to "pick up" from the newer talent I've auditioned. I've been encountering more and more talent walking into my booth with some pretty bad reading habits, talent leaving out or inserting words, talent walking in cold trying to "wing it", and talent picking up and retaking every other line of their copy.

When people like me give advice to new talent, often one of the main pointers we'll give is "Read out loud EVERY day". It's funny how often I meet resistance to this idea. I'm not trying to give you homework, or make your life more difficult, I've genuinely found that the better you can read, the better you are at auditioning. One of the reasons this advice might be challenged is invariabley a new talent will ask an established talent if they read out loud every day, to which the established talent will probably say "no".


"See! THEY book jobs and don't read out loud everyday!"

Except for the fact that they do. The established working/booking talent is always in shape, tackling auditions and jobs EVERY day. If you're only exercising your VO muscles once or twice a week, then the established talent will eat you for lunch nine times out of ten.

A practical example of reading comprehension you ask? Certainly!
While working for a TV client producing nature narration, the producer originally worked with a seasoned voice talent. This gentleman was a machine. His pick up/retake ratio was literally in the ballpark of one pick up every 30 minutes with maybe two re-directs from the client PER HOUR LONG EPISODE of TV. A natural, engaging story teller, and he was an absolute DREAM to work with. We finished an entire season of TV a day early due to his efficiency, taking a five day job down to four, a TWENTY percent reduction in studio costs.

For the second season of this show, one of the producers wanted to go with a younger sound on the narration. We held a casting, they picked a voice they liked and we jumped into the project. The new talent required MANY more retakes and re-directs. There wasn't anything necessarily wrong with the sessions, but there was a constantly feeling of "flow interrupted", and it's never a good feeling knowing you'll have more editing to do at the end of a session. Plus, not only was the new talent not able to get the job done as quickly, but needed an additional day to get some elements cleaned up.

The producers are gearing up for season three. Which talent do you think will be narrating it?

So voice actors, I'm REALLY not trying to be a jerk, or give you homework, or make you work harder than you think you should be, but if you want to be competitive in this (REALLY competitive) PLEASE read out loud every day. PLEASE practice your reading. I PROMISE it will make you a better auditioner, and a better auditioner is usually a better booker...

Friday, July 11, 2008

Noise Reduction shoot out - Sound Forge, iZotope, Audacity, Audition, Waves, and doin it by hand!

So, this is going to be a longer post...

We're going to compare 6 different methods of noise reduction.

I get a lot of questions about cleaning up audio after recording, hums, clicks, pops, line noise, neighbors, fridge, etc. A lot of people are still trying to gate or EQ this stuff out, and those methods don't work particularly well for voice over, especially dry auditions.

Gating will turn off the audio signal when you're not speaking, which gives you perfect silence, but when you start speaking again the noise is back too. This can be VERY unnatural depending on the noise.EQ can work, but usually to the detriment of the entire piece of audio, as you are carving out chunks of the frequency spectrum. Those chunks start carving into your voice as well. Sort of like destroying the town to save the town...

Ideally you'd just want to record clean in the first place, but sometimes you just can't help but knock something out and hope you can clean it up after the fact.Noise Reduction plugins to the rescue!To test, I set up my Solaris to records in "Figure 8" mode (so the front and back of the mic are recording equally), set one side up for me, and put the other side of the mic right up against my bathroom door with the fan running.

This is a worse case scenario for voice over, as fans tend to generate noise that slices right through the middle of the human voice's spectrum. That means that as you remove fan noise, you're likely carving out a chunk of the voice as well. A less extreme version of this would be a fridge kicking on or the AC running.

All of these plugins (and doing it by hand) work on the same general principal, point out what undesirable noise looks like, and try to get rid of only that noise. [Check out the Audacity Tutorial for Noise Reduction in practice - Ed.]

I attacked the samples pretty aggressively with each method. For the test, the main idea was to all but eliminate the background noise, even if it damaged the voice. Real world, you would probably want to leave a little more noise to prevent damaging the recording.


So first up, here's the unaltered file:



Sony Sound Forge NR plugin:



iZotope RX De-Noiser:



Audacity NR plugin:



Adobe Audition NR Plugin:



Doin it by hand with Phase Inverse:



Waves Restoration X-Noise:



Again, this is most certainly a worst case scenario when it comes to noise reduction, and hopefully you don't encounter this much noise on a regular basis. I find the results interesting listening back. There are two methods up here which are essentially free, and the most expensive plugin comes in a pack which runs about $1000.



So what do YOU think? Are there other plugins that I'm missing?

Monday, February 11, 2008

Getting the job DONE! - Recording in an airport with Pizzuto

This was just a funny little story from my pal David:

When David Sobolov, Mark Freidlander and Eric Williams from SAG and myself, were traveling back from the GDC in Austin, we were changing planes in Phoenix when we got a call from AAA for a last minute audition. I had my studio with me in it's roll on case and so we asked the airline personnel if we could set up and record to send an audition to LA.
LOL, after a few quick explanations to gaping mouths and questioning eyes, they shrugged and said sure. I whipped out the Powerbook, mBox, neumann mic, headphones and between airport announcements were knocking takes out when the TSA showed up with the airport police. After a quick explanation of what the gear was and what we were doing with about 30 minutes to flight time, we cranked out, edited and sent the auditions to Abrams in LA using the airport wi-fi...to the applause of the small crowd gathered and thanked them for their silence, patience and understanding...and on to our flight back to LA.
Thanks David!

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Sound Forge vs Audition .... Ready FIGHT!

Following up on my call for help from yesterday, here is a WAY over detailed shoot out between the two programs.

Just to spoil the results, Adobe just edges out Sony, but I'm not sure I completely agree. They slam Sound Forge for not being multitrack, but that was the whole point of SF9, was to add multi.
Is it AS good as Adobe's, most certainly not, but you CAN do it.

I call rigged...

Sound Forge 9.0

Adobe Audition 3